Training that sticks,built by a learning scientist.

Black-and-white photo of dense construction scaffolding rising against a pale sky
I'm a learning scientist before I'm a technologist. When I build training systems, I build them around how people actually learn — which means designing against the real failure modes: attention drifting after the first hour, cognitive overload by lunch, everything forgotten by next week. Because you need your people to genuinely learn, not just pass a quiz.
BOOK A CALL

15 min · no pitch

Training for one person? Or 8? Check.

I design 1:1 training differently than I design 1:many. Different needs, different planning, different delivery. A solo owner learning a new CRM needs a working session: me beside them, in their actual data, fixing what breaks as it breaks. A team of five needs shared vocabulary and shared vision just as much as the knowledge of the tools. Let's not pretend one shape fits both situations. Let's give your people what they need.

It's not learning if it's gone next month

The rollout went fine, the trainer got 5 stars, the quiz scores looked great — and four weeks later no one remembers what they “learned.” That's not a people problem. It's a learning design problem. That's why I build learning from the science up: spacing what they encounter, building in retrieval instead of reminders, and anchoring the learning in real situations. It takes more advance planning, sure. But it takes far less remediation when you realize, six months in, the training didn't take.

Knowing whether it worked

Training works when you can see it working. I build evaluation in from day one — not just completion rates, but the behaviors that show the learning has landed. You'll see people doing the work differently, faster, with more confidence. You'll know the training paid off. So will they.

Let’s build something your team will actually use.

BOOK A CALL

15 min · no pitch